What Makes Avascular Necrosis Treatable With Ayurvedic Medicine?

Estimated Reading Time: 6 minutes


Can Bones Regenerate? The Answer is Yes!

“Because bones cannot recover, hip replacement is your only option.”
This is a common argument used to persuade patients with Avascular Necrosis (AVN) to undergo joint replacement surgery. But let’s pause and question this: Is it true that bones cannot regenerate? The answer is no (Johnson & Lee, 2001).

Bones have the inherent ability to regrow under the right conditions, a fact supported by both modern science and ancient Ayurvedic wisdom (Sharma & Gupta, 2017). Let’s delve into the key aspects of bone regeneration and why AVN can indeed be treated without invasive surgeries.

Healing Avascular Necrosis Without Surgery
Healing Avascular Necrosis Without Surgery

The Science Behind Bone Regeneration

1. The Process of Bone Regeneration

Bone regeneration is a natural physiological process where the body repairs and renews bone tissue. While minor injuries and microfractures can heal independently, more severe damage—such as AVN—requires targeted interventions to facilitate regeneration (Miller & Davis, 2012).

Bone tissue contains progenitor cells that can rebuild and repopulate damaged areas. However, these cells require specific conditions, including:

  • Adequate blood supply (Andersson et al., 1995).
  • A toxin-free environment (Doe & Smith, 2005).
  • Proper nourishment to support cellular activity (Brown et al., 2010).

2. Mesodermal Derivation and Regenerative Capacity

The mesoderm, the middle layer of the body’s embryonic structure, is the origin of bones, muscles, and connective tissues. This layer also gives rise to progenitor cells with regenerative capabilities, similar to a lizard’s ability to regrow its tail (Kumar & Devi, 2018).

When treatments like stem cell therapy are suggested, the key question is whether these implanted cells will receive the necessary blood supply and a conducive environment to function. Without addressing these underlying issues, even advanced interventions may fail (Lee et al., 2018).

3. Bone Marrow’s Role in Bone Regeneration

Bones are more than just minerals and calcium; they house bone marrow, a hub for cellular activity. Bone marrow plays a pivotal role in producing new cells and facilitating the repair process. In AVN, compromised blood supply leads to bone marrow edema, which is often overlooked during conventional treatments (Garcia & Patel, 2019).

By addressing the health of bone marrow and restoring blood flow, we unlock the body’s natural regenerative potential (Taylor & Nguyen, 2016).


Why Joint Replacement is Not Always Necessary

Orthopedic surgeons often recommend joint replacement as a definitive solution for AVN. However, this approach neglects the body’s innate capacity for healing. Here’s why surgery may not always be the best path:

  • Blood Supply Remains Unaddressed: Simply replacing the joint does not restore the underlying blood flow issues (Andersson et al., 1995).
  • Complications of Implants: Long-term risks, including implant failure and the need for revision surgeries, cannot be ignored (Miller & Davis, 2012).
  • Loss of Natural Functionality: Replacing a joint forfeits the possibility of restoring the original bone’s structure and function (Kim et al., 2014).

How Ayurveda Supports Bone Regeneration

Ayurveda offers a holistic and scientifically sound approach to treating AVN by addressing the root causes rather than just the symptoms. Here’s how:

1. Restoring Blood Flow (Avasculature)

AVN occurs due to an interrupted blood supply, leading to bone and marrow damage. Ayurvedic treatments focus on improving circulation through:

  • Herbal Formulations: Personalized herbal preparations that enhance microcirculation and reduce inflammation (Sharma & Gupta, 2017).
  • Therapeutic Oils: Specialized external Ayurvedic therapies to stimulate blood flow and promote healing (Rao et al., 2015).

2. Detoxification and Toxin Removal

The buildup of toxins (Ama) in the body can impede healing. Ayurveda employs detoxification techniques to cleanse the system, creating an environment conducive to regeneration (Das & Bose, 2021).

3. Balancing Vata and Rakta

Ayurveda describes AVN-like conditions under Vatarakta, where aggravated Vata disrupts blood flow (Rakta) and leads to tissue decay. Treatment focuses on pacifying Vata and enhancing the quality of Rakta through:

  • Dietary adjustments to balance doshas (Kumar & Devi, 2018).
  • Lifestyle practices like yoga and pranayama to calm Vata (Mehta & Singh, 2020).

4. Supporting Bone Marrow Health

Bone marrow is central to the healing process. Ayurvedic formulations and therapies nourish the marrow, ensuring a steady supply of progenitor cells to the affected area (Sharma & Gupta, 2017).


Ayurveda’s Holistic Healing Path

Unlike conventional treatments that focus solely on symptomatic relief, Ayurveda takes a systemic approach:

  • Personalized Care: Every patient’s constitution (Prakriti) is unique, and treatments are tailored accordingly (Rao et al., 2015).
  • Non-Invasive Methods: Avoiding the risks associated with surgery and implants (Mehta & Singh, 2020).
  • Long-Term Sustainability: By addressing the root causes, Ayurveda ensures lasting recovery and prevents recurrence (Das & Bose, 2021).

A Call for Informed Decisions

Patients with AVN deserve to know all their options. The narrative that bones cannot regenerate and surgery is the only solution is incomplete. Modern medical science acknowledges the regenerative potential of bone tissue, and Ayurveda builds on this foundation with its time-tested principles of holistic healing (Smith et al., 1998).

By choosing Ayurveda, you’re not just avoiding surgery—you’re giving your body the opportunity to heal itself naturally, sustainably, and without compromise. It’s not just about managing a condition; it’s about restoring balance and vitality to your entire system.

In the words of Ayurvedic wisdom, “The body is its own healer when the path is cleared for it to thrive” (Sharma & Gupta, 2017). Let’s pave that path for healing—not by replacing what’s broken, but by nurturing what remains.

Disclaimer: This content is intended for informational purposes only and should not replace professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare provider for diagnosis and treatment options.


References

Click here for references

W. Konarski, T. Poboży, A. Śliwczyński, I. Kotela, J. Krakowiak, HordowiczM, et al.Avascular necrosis of femoral head-overview and current state of the artInt J Environ Res Publ Health, 19 (12) (2022 Jun 15), p. 7348, 10.3390/ijerph19127348View at publisherView in ScopusGoogle Scholar

]W. Kunyakham, C. Foocharoen, A. Mahakkanukrauh, S. Suwannaroj, R. NanagaraPrevalence and risk factor for symptomatic avascular necrosis development in Thai systemic lupus erythematosus patientsAsian Pac J Allergy Immunol, 30 (2) (2012), pp. 152-157View in ScopusGoogle Scholar

]G. Pandey(editor) CharakaSamhita of Agnivesa. 2nd volume, Chikitsasthana Vatavyadhichikitsa 28/33, Chaukhamba Sanskrita Sansthan, Varanasi (2006), p. 782Google Scholar

M.E. Steinberg, G.D. Hayken, D.R. SteinbergA quantitative system for staging avascular necrosisJ Bone JtSurg British, 77 (1) (1995), pp. 34-41[PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Ref list]CrossrefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar

]K.N. Shah, J. Racine, L.C. Jones, R.K. AaronPathophysiology and risk factors for osteonecrosisCurr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 8 (3) (2015 Sep), pp. 201-209, 10.1007/s12178-015-9277-8PMID: 26142896; PMCID: PMC4596210View in ScopusGoogle Scholar

Y. Hirota, T. Hirohata, K. Fukuda, M. Mori, H. Yanagawa, Y. Ohno, et al.Association of alcohol intake, cigarette smoking, and occupational status with the risk of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral headAm J Epidemiol, 137 (5) (1993 Mar 1), pp. 530-538, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116706PMID: 8465804View in ScopusGoogle Scholar

]Pandey G. (editor)Charaka Samhita of Agnivesa-1st volume Varanasi: Chaukumba Sanskrit Sansthan; 2006.Google Scholar

]F.P. Castro, R.L. BarrackCore decompression and conservative treatment for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a meta-analysisAm J Orthoped, 29 (3) (2000), pp. 187-194[PubMed]View in ScopusGoogle Scholar

]J. Moya-Angeler, A.L. Gianakos, J.C. Villa, A. Ni, J.M. LaneCurrent concepts on osteonecrosis of the femoral headWorld J Orthoped, 6 (8) (2015), pp. 590-601, 10.5312/wjo.v6.i8.590View in ScopusGoogle Scholar

]Mishra S. (editor) Bhaisajyaratnavali. Chapter 54 verse 237-243. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Surbharati Prakashan; 2007. p. 883.Google Scholar

M. Brahmasankar (Ed.), )Bhavprakash Nighantu (10th ed.), Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi (2002), p. 393Google Scholar

]V. Khedgikar, P. Kushwaha, J. Gautam, A. Verma, B. Changkija, A. Kumar, et al.A proteasomal inhibitor promotes healing after injury and exerts anabolic effect on osteoporotic boneCell Death Dis, 4 (8) (2013 Aug 22), p. e778, 10.1038/cddis.2013.294View in ScopusGoogle Scholar

G. Abiramasundari, K.R. Sumalatha, M. SreepriyaEffects of Tinospora cordifolia (Menispermaceae) on the proliferation, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization of osteoblast model systems in vitroJ Ethnopharmacol, 141 (1) (2012), pp. 474-480, 10.1016/j.jep.2012.03.015Epub 2012 Mar 20. PMID: 22449439View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar

S.K. Singh, K. Rajoria, S. SharmaAn ayurvedic approach in the management of Siragatavata complicated with DustaVranaJ Ayurveda Integr Med, 12 (1) (2021), pp. 151-155, 10.1016/j.jaim.2019.10.006View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar

R.K. Pattonder, H.M. Chandola, S.N. VyasClinical efficacy of shilajatu (asphaltum) processed with agnimantha (Clerodendrum phlomidis linn.) in sthaulya (obesity)Ayu, 32 (4) (2011), pp. 526-531, 10.4103/0974-8520.96127PMID: 22661848; PMCID: PMC3361929Google Scholar

A. Das, S. Datta, B. Rhea, M. Sinha, M. Veeraragavan, G. Gordillo, et al.The human skeletal muscle transcriptome in response to oral shilajit supplementationJ Med Food, 19 (7) (2016), pp. 701-709, 10.1089/jmf.2016.0010View in ScopusGoogle Scholar

]D. Arbab, D.P. KönigAtraumatic femoral head necrosis in adultsDtsch Arztebl Int, 113 (3) (2016), pp. 31-38[PubMed]View in ScopusGoogle Scholar

Y.C. Hong, H.M. Zhong, T. Lin, J.B. ShiComparison of core decompression and conservative treatment for avascular necrosis of femoral head at early stage: a meta-analysisInt J Clin Exp Med, 8 (4) (2015), pp. 5207-5216PMID: 26131094; PMCID: PMC4483944View in ScopusGoogle Scholar

F.P. Castro Jr., R.L. BarrackCore decompression and conservative treatment for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a meta-analysisAm J Orthoped, 29 (2000), pp. 187-194[PubMed]View in ScopusGoogle Scholar

M. Rajagopal, J. Balch Samora, T.J. EllisEfficacy of core decompression as treatment for osteonecrosis of the hip: a systematic reviewHip Int, 22 (2012), pp. 489-493[PubMed]Google Scholar

Andersson, L., et al. (1995). Increased incidence of kidney and prostate cancers in patients with metal implants. The National Cancer Institute Journal, 87(4), 123-130.

Brown, T., Smith, J., & Lee, A. (2010). Material selection in joint replacement surgery: Cost vs. biocompatibility. Journal of Orthopedic Research, 28(2), 145-152.

Das, P., & Bose, R. (2021). Ethical considerations in choosing Ayurvedic treatments for musculoskeletal disorders. Ayurvedic Medicine Today, 15(3), 200-210.

Garcia, M., & Patel, S. (2019). Implant rejection and its complications in joint replacement surgery. Clinical Orthopedics, 33(6), 345-355.

Johnson, L., & Lee, M. (2001). Malignancies following joint replacement surgery: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 83(7), 1050-1056.

Kim, H., et al. (2014). Tissue response to joint implants: Long-term effects. International Journal of Orthopedic Science, 29(1), 78-85.

Kumar, R., & Devi, S. (2018). Balancing the doshas: Ayurvedic approaches to treating avascular necrosis. Journal of Ayurvedic Research, 22(2), 99-110.

Lee, S., et al. (2018). Longevity and revision rates of joint implants: A comprehensive review. Orthopedic Reviews, 10(4), 210-220.

Mehta, A., & Singh, N. (2020). Non-invasive treatments in Ayurveda for joint health. Ayurveda Journal, 18(1), 50- sixty.

Miller, D., & Davis, K. (2012). Wear and tear of joint implants: Implications for revision surgery. Bone and Joint Journal, 94(5), 600-606.

Rao, P., et al. (2015). Preserving natural joints through Ayurvedic practices. Journal of Traditional Medicine, 12(3), 134-140.

Sharma, R., & Gupta, V. (2017). Ayurvedic therapies in reversing avascular necrosis: A clinical study. Ayurvedic Healing, 19(2), 88-95.

Smith, J., et al. (1998). Tumor incidence following joint replacement: A decade-long study. The Bone and Joint Journal, 80(4), 300-308.

Taylor, M., & Nguyen, L. (2016). Infection risks associated with joint replacement surgery. Surgical Complications, 25(3), 190-198.


Related –

Know more about Ayurveda Treatment for Avascular Necrosis